Firearms / Personal Defense

Pascal’s Wager, Self-Defense, and Gun Ownership

I have heard a lot of sayings about guns and self-defense in the last couple of years. The most popular are surely “Better to be judged by 12 than carried by 6” and “When seconds count, police are just minutes away.”

I recently heard a new one, though. I liked it because it was reminiscent of Pascal’s Wager.

"Blaise Pascal Versailles" by unknown; a copy of the painture of François II Quesnel, which was made for Gérard Edelinck en 1691. - Own work. Licensed under CC BY 3.0 via Wikimedia Commons

“Blaise Pascal Versailles” by unknown; a copy of the painture of François II Quesnel, which was made for Gérard Edelinck en 1691. – Own work. Licensed under CC BY 3.0 via Wikimedia Commons

 As Wikipedia explains it, Pascal’s Wager “posits that humans all bet with their lives either that God exists or not. Given the possibility that God actually does exist and assuming an infinite gain or loss associated with belief or unbelief in said God (as represented by an eternity in heaven or hell), a rational person should live as though God exists and seek to believe in God. If God does not actually exist, such a person will have only a finite loss (some pleasures, luxury, etc.).”

The self-defense and gun ownership version: It’s better to own a gun and not need it, than to need a gun and not own it.

This highlights the risk assessment that often goes into self-defense gun ownership. It is not the probability of needing a gun that matters; it is the possibility. The cost of having a gun and not needing it is much less than needing a gun and not having it. So, even if the odds of needing a gun are very low, it is a wise to place your bet on ownership.

Photo from strangemilitary.com

Photo from strangemilitary.com

Advertisements

7 thoughts on “Pascal’s Wager, Self-Defense, and Gun Ownership

  1. Pingback: Rapping About Defensive Gun Carry Equivalent of Pascal’s Wager | Gun Culture 2.0

  2. Pingback: Assessing Risk in the Decision to Carry a Gun | Gun Culture 2.0

  3. Pingback: Guns, Health, and Relative Risks | Gun Culture 2.0

  4. Pingback: Tom Givens on Training Parameters for Civilian Gun Carry | Gun Culture 2.0

  5. Pingback: Mike Seeklander: “The Way is Training” | Gun Culture 2.0

  6. Pingback: Revisiting Col. Cooper’s “Principles of Personal Defense” | Gun Culture 2.0

  7. Pingback: Guns and (Relative) Risk Management – by A.C. Haskins | Gun Culture 2.0

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s