Why Guns Are Neither USED nor USEFUL for Self-Defense – The Standard Model Part 2 of 5 (Light Over Heat #42)

Last week I discussed some work I am doing systematizing the dominant academic approach to understanding Gun Culture 2.0, what I call “The Standard Model of Explaining the Irrationality of Defensive Gun Ownership.”

The model has 6 points. In this 2nd of 5 planned videos, I discuss point 2: That guns are neither USED nor USEFUL for self-defense.

I also offer some critiques of this point in the model.

Please surf over to my “Light Over Heat” YouTube channel and SUBSCRIBE to follow, RING THE BELL to receive notifications, and SHARE so others can learn about this work.

If you are able to support this work financially, please consider making a contribution:

Donate with PayPal button

Buy Me A Coffee


  1. So in 96 cases out of 100 where a DGU user uses a gun in self defense due to feeling one’s own, or someone you can lawfully defend, life was at risk, the good guy wins. Nice odds.


      • It shouldn’t be too hard to tally the number of times a legal carrier stopped a deadly threat against themselves or another, and compare it to the number of times a carrier negligently injured or killed themselves or another innocent person. Included in the former should be every instance of a carrier stopping a mass shooting, applying the average number of casualties in a public mass shooting.

        The same comparison could be done for legal firearms in the home. (And, considering my ‘lived experience,’ protection against deadly wild animals should be included.)


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.