Sex and Guns: Safer not Safe

I just finished a draft of my book chapter on “Pascal’s Wager and Firearms.” It’s all about risk, risk assessment, and risk management in relation to firearms. From there I am rolling into a chapter on negative outcomes, which will of course highlight the work of the Professor of Negative Outcomes, Claude Werner.

A Tweet I saw yesterday directed my attention to an op-ed written by a leading suicide researcher created a nice bridge between these two chapters. It had to do with preventing gun “violence” (to include suicide and accidents) via safe storage. For me the most interesting part was the last paragraph, so either read or skip to the end and find the following:

Firearms are here to stay. Just as we encourage safe sex rather than abstinence to reduce the burden of teenage pregnancy, we can encourage safe firearm storage rather than simply discouraging firearm ownership altogether in our efforts to reduce gun violence.

Michael Anestis
Spoof ad from Fernet-Branca Instagram feed @fernetbranca

To be sure, gun violence prevention advocates like Anestis and gun organizations that promote safety like the NSSF (Project Childsafe) define safe storage differently. But my interest in this passage is the broader analogy proposed between guns and sex.

Like Anestis, in my Sociology of Guns seminar last fall, one of my students drew on her experience promoting sexual health and education on college campuses to highlight the negative consequences of adopting an abstinence-based approach to gun safety education. We can no more get people to “just say no” to guns than we can to sex.

Too often the #gunsafety (rebranded gun control) movement has adopted a safety FROM guns rather than a safety WITH guns approach. But Anestis’ analogy to sex is right on with one significant caveat:

There is no SAFE sex, only safeR sex.

The caveat is important in understanding guns and gun owners also.

Risk can never be completely eliminated from sex, but we are willing to spend some risk in order to reap the rewards. The same is true with guns. Although there is safer gun handling, risk can never be eliminated entirely. Many gun owners recognize this but are willing to spend some risk for the various rewards that come with ownership and use.

Buy me a drinkIf you want to support my work, please buy me a drink

4 comments

  1. Good points, David. What is usually referred to as Rule 2 of gun safety is often phrased as, “always point a gun in a safe direction.” Like others, I always point out that there is really no truly safe direction – just safer than other choices. So I tend to say it as, “always point a gun in the safest possible direction given the circumstances (or context) you are in at any given moment.” I often also include the version “never point a gun at anything you don’t want to destroy” if I feel the need to be a bit more dramatic.

    Liked by 2 people

  2. If “Safe Storage” means your guns and ammo are locked up then the bad guy breaking into your home while you’re asleep will win the gun fight.
    Sorry. My guns are within arms reach at all times. And loaded.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.