Firearms

On Representing Gun Culture through Photographs: Silhouette

In my last post, I discussed the ways in which photographer Garrett O. Hansen’s The Void both represents and misrepresents gun culture.

The second part of his “HAIL” series is called Silhouette. According to Hansen, “While The Void series deals with the power of the single bullet, the Silhouette series engages the broader culture of guns in America.”

For the pieces in this collection, Hansen gathered the cardboard backings which are used to hold humanoid paper targets at gun ranges. Hansen calls these an “unarmed man’s silhouette.”

In a darkroom he made prints of the cardboard which he then turned into one-to-one replicas in mirrored plexiglass. Hansen describes the experience of viewing the works when they are displayed: “As viewers approach the piece, they see their own reflections hollowed out by the countless bullets.”

Garrett O. Hansen, Silhouette. Used with permission.

I find these works quite compelling. I am even looking into purchasing one. Why?

The first time I taught my Sociology of Guns course and took my students to the range, one student asked to shoot a non-humanoid target. This opened up to later conversations about the appropriateness of using humanoid targets when one is just out shooting for fun. And why when we are training for defensive purposes we use humanoid targets rather than more realistic targets.

Garrett O. Hansen photography exhibit. Used with permission.

I have not had the experience of standing before these works and seeing myself reflected in the hollowed out target backing. But the thought of the experience brings me back to Massad Ayoob’s MAG-40 class. As I discussed in a (now quite) old post, from the very first session of MAG-40, Ayoob stresses that life is precious and the use of lethal force is a cosmic decision that is not to be made lightly. Silhouette makes this point in a profound way.

 

8 thoughts on “On Representing Gun Culture through Photographs: Silhouette

  1. Pingback: On Representing (and Misrepresenting) Gun Culture through Photographs: The Void | Gun Culture 2.0

  2. Pingback: Final Thoughts on Representing and Misrepresenting Gun Culture Through Photographs: Memorial | Gun Culture 2.0

  3. Target types do have various effects. Most of the time, it is obviously just that, an inanimate target. I’ve always thought that self defense classes should be using humanoid targets of some kind, if for no other reason than to help the attendees gauge their feelings about shooting someone if it ever came to that. And very realistic photographic targets are another thing altogether, especially when using magnified optical sights …

    Like

  4. Pingback: My Top 10 Favorite Posts of 2017 | Gun Culture 2.0

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.